Search

Musk and Tesla are not inseparable

What would Tesla be without Elon Musk? This is not a rhetorical question.

At about 3am in the Californian morning Thursday, the chief executive made an odd joke on Twitter, for someone running a company with a $52bn equity-market capitalisation (it's been deleted since):

Well, it would be odd for almost any other high profile chief executive. Elon Musk, however, has taken a more Trumpist approach to communications with his 22m followers -- for instance calling a rescue diver a pedophile in one exchange, for which he later apologised.

Some have seen in this approach an attempt to create a smokescreen to deflect from problems at Tesla, which is struggling to produce the mass market electric car it has long promised, at a profit.

We've also shared a theory that the billionaire may be playing eight dimensional chess. The carelessness of his attempts to deflect don't fit with his history of carefully cultivating his public image, so maybe he wants a lower stock price to take Tesla private.

Yet the tweet above is more suggestive of someone acting erratically under pressure, as are many of his other recent actions. Take for example his decision to call the family office that employs pseudonymous analyst Montana Skeptic to complain about the analyst's critical posts about Tesla, as described in a farewell post.

This comes after Musk proposed a bizarre journalist ranking scheme called Pravda, and abruptly cut off analysts on an earnings call: "Boring bonehead questions are not cool. Next?”

We can understand the pressure, and frustration. Tesla is trying to do something new, to make and sell an affordable electric car in mass-market volumes. It has also tried to bring an unusual amount of automation to its factories, disregarding experienced auto-industry advice.

The valuation of the company, several times its annual sales, rests on a vision not just of success but domination of the industry. Meanwhile earnings loom next week and cash appears to be tight: the WSJ recently reported that Tesla had asked suppliers to help it become profitable with reimbursements.

Meanwhile Twitter is a forum where shortsellers and critics can gleefully flag up any hint of trouble, or evidence of consumer dissatisfaction:

We've also thrown our Billions of Blistering Barnacles series into the mix, adding to the 500,000 critical articles out there.

Historically, Telsa and Musk's reputation were as seamlessly intertwined as his corporate interests. Its cars were proof of his vision. His value to the company was so great that a $50bn compensation plan was invented to keep him interested.

Yet in an industry where rivals include an actual criminal company, VW, Tesla is surely the aspirant do-gooder's vehicle of choice. The car is fast, clean, and high-tech, so its buyers can feel like they are paying for a better future.

But if Musk's erratic behaviour continues there will come a point, once unthinkable, when Tesla's board has to consider that the disruptive car company might be better off with out the genius entrepreneur.

A final straw could be a cash crunch that forces Tesla to raise fresh equity, after Musk has said repeatedly no such fundraising would be necessary this year.

Further production difficulties could also be a catalyst. Several senior staff members have departed this year, and a controversial memo - which threatened those in the supply chain who can't keep up - described a centralisation of decision making with Musk.

The board might also consider the effects of the founder's habit of picking fights. Last month he sent an email to employees, obtained by CNBC, which accused an employee of sabotage, then sued the ex-employee, Martin Tripp, who has since retained Meissner Associates, a law firm with form, to represent him in a whistleblower complain to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Silencing Montana Skeptic on Twitter, meanwhile, only served to draw attention to the investor's blogs on Seeking Alpha, which contain such outrages as a reasonable analysis of the gross margin effect of Tesla's in-house dealership, and how to factor that into comparisons for the profitability of automakers.

Musk has also attacked journalist Linette Lopez of Business Insider:

Maybe none of this matters out in the real world, where a great review is far more important. Selling cars at a sustainable profit (including pesky central sales costs and research and development expenses) will make everything right.

Still, Musk's behaviour isn't what we'd expect from the world's most forward-thinking carmaker. As storied management guru Eddie Izzard once said: “Cool is a pursuit of youth, it's a fashion linked thing, being cool. It's linked to a circle. You have looking like a dickhead over here - average looking - kind of cool cool cool hip and groovy - looking like a dickhead”.

Pushing out someone who holds a fifth of the stock will never be easy, but then Travis Kalanick controlled more of Uber's voting stock before he resigned.

Without profits, Tesla will run out of cash. Earlier this year Musk joked about bankruptcy, mocking the short sellers who have long predicted it.

It's hard to imagine Tesla reaching that point, however, because of the value of the brand which could tempt another automaker to step in with a strategic injection of cash and know-how. The market leader in electric cars they'd surely want. It is less likely they would want the man who had to put his company's car production in a tent.

  1. Libraries, from Carnegie to Bezos
  2. Crypto & government: from anarchy to amity in the USA
  3. 'I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I cannot sanction this Series B round'
  4. RBC, through the FANG barrier
  5. Self-help to buy
  6. CFA: Chartered crypto analysts -- updated
  7. The Netflix dilemma -- updated
  8. Fujitsu's new blockchain offering: really cheap or really expensive?
  9. Nothing But the Shirt on Your Back
  10. Universities of Britain: cosying up to crypto is a bad look
  11. How to make a living in the cult of meritocracy
  12. Spotify: Drake-oil salesmen
  13. Oh, the digital humanity
  14. Building a blockchain Britain in Bloxwich, because ...?
  15. Sports are not markets, predictions ain't investment
  16. Spot the difference, Steinhoff edition
  17. Larry Robbins, a cautionary tale
  18. The node to serfdom
  19. Carney is down with the crypto kids
  20. Samsonite: inventory, excess baggage, and unresolved questions
  21. It might be a long wait for “the equivalent alternative to ICOs”
  22. Don't blame it on the sunshine
  23. In corporate America, brands develop you
  24. One in ten dollars of US housing were anonymous
  25. Should AT&T worry more about its debt?
  26. Who cares if Elon is incinerating capital?
  27. Let’s not try make 'crypto chicks' a thing
  28. Tokens all the way down
  29. Eight-dimensional chess with Elon Musk
  30. A lopsided trade is a good trade, Italian inflation edition
  31. How to buy Italian fire insurance
  32. Atlas bugged
  33. Inflating inflation
  34. Crypto's most devout believers are suffering a crisis of faith
  35. Plus500: past performance is no guide to the future
  36. Noble rot in a shrinking Harbour
  37. In defence of ticket touts
  38. Please don't tell individual investors to buy leveraged loans
  39. RIB Software: the unicorn rainy-day fund
  40. Retail is not dead
  41. Did Soros really give Tesla a “vote of confidence”?
  42. At a crypto conference in New York, it feels like 2017 all over again
  43. Egregious expectations - Intelsat edition
  44. Bitcoin cash is expanding into the void
  45. Stop getting The Flintstones wrong
  46. Bond investors do not care if Argentina is solvent in 100 years
  47. Ubiquiti Networks: of cash and borrowed time
  48. “We're very disappointed in you, Spotify”
  49. 'Sex redistribution' and the means of reproduction
  50. Tesla probably needs to raise capital this year
  51. No entitlement crisis in America
  52. Free cash flow to whom?
  53. Hey crypto bros! Journalism ≠ advertising
  54. Human capital and the jobs guarantee
  55. This is a tech bubble, when's the crash?
  56. The magic of adjustments: ebitla-dee-da
  57. FUD, inglorious FUD
  58. A complex analysis reaches same conclusion as simple one: hedge funds suck
  59. The jobs guarantee and human-capital “nationalisation”
  60. These hedge fund numbers can't be right
  61. The Vomiting Camel has escaped from Bitcoin zoo
  62. Lies, damn lies, and charticles
  63. The world doesn't need more Elon Musks
  64. No, Facebook should not become a nonprofit
  65. Sell all crypto and abandon all blockchain
  66. Immutable ledgers meet European data protection
  67. Amazon is not a bubble
  68. Japan's economic miracle
  69. Have you ever meta crypto joke you didn't like?
  70. Delaware should change its rules to let the light in
  71. Who needs the labels anyway?
  72. Baby Boomers want your family to finance a larger share of their retirement
  73. No, America would not benefit from authoritarian central planning
  74. No one needs to buy Tesla
  75. How to win a debate in the cult of meritocracy
  76. Steinhoff International and the case of Pepkor Global Sourcing
  77. Sorry Jack, Bitcoin will not become the global currency
  78. The “academic’s cryptocurrency” is an elegant waste of time
  79. Cigarettes are the vice America needs
  80. Well that’s one reason to buy yen…
  81. Musicians, don't just blame the labels for your lack of dough
  82. Giving stock away to staff doesn't absolve share buybacks
  83. A penny for Macpherson’s thoughts on the nominal anchor
  84. Monopoly and its discontents
  85. A State of Mind
  86. America is not the least protectionist country in the world
  87. This is nuts, when does Netflix crash?
  88. No Bloomberg, the world's richest people did not lose $114bn...
  89. Someone is wrong on the internet, government employee pensions and passive investing edition
  90. Someone is wrong on the internet, possibly fragile
  91. Someone is wrong on the internet, consumer financial regulation edition
  92. Someone is wrong on the internet: tontine tokens [Update]
  93. Someone is wrong on the internet, road economics edition
  94. Someone is wrong on the internet, wages and the stock market edition
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2018. All rights reserved. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Read Again https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2018/07/27/1532664000000/Musk-and-Tesla-are-not-inseparable/

Bagikan Berita Ini

Related Posts :

0 Response to "Musk and Tesla are not inseparable"

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.